No of course. I'm just colored surprised Deepshit wouldn't consider making a profit from it. But corporate isn't known for being the most innovative in the shed, so.
SR2 Saints Row 2 Mega Patch isn't coming... but
- Thread starter Admixon
- Start date
-
- Tags
- remastered sr2
Assuming GTA 6 isn't a sham filled with expensive technology with poor execution, the content it supposedly would have wouldn't make $100 dollars outrages.
It isn't Call Of Duty yearly release so paying 100 dollars for a game with a billion-dollar budget (supposedly) game with competent developers isn't the worst thing in the world.
People who complain about 100 dollars is just whinny, like don't buy the game then, wait for the price to come down, and if other developers follow suit, then don't buy their games and they'll learn.
Deep Sliver, the publishers behind many trashy games such as Ride to Hell: Retribution, Mighty No. 9., Payday 3, Homefront The Revolution and Duke Nukem: Critical Mass for Nintendo DS.
Last edited:
That's what I said
Even if its not VR the original creator probably do something worse
They probably gonna Pay for day one to play GTA6 and also its gonna be released on consoles first PC peasant must wait for 1-2 years lol
OOT.. if The original creator really serious to reboot sr back 70s there 90% its still gonna be bad agree and disagree in here but hey at least we dont fighting anymore right the franchise is dead... I have no hope if the ip still owned by DS and dude wants them to allow him to produce more SR..
That $100 we dont know if include with the whole game or we must pay another dlc (if they madeit) for me.. yeah im gonna wait for the price going below..
They probably gonna Pay for day one to play GTA6 and also its gonna be released on consoles first PC peasant must wait for 1-2 years lol
OOT.. if The original creator really serious to reboot sr back 70s there 90% its still gonna be bad agree and disagree in here but hey at least we dont fighting anymore right the franchise is dead... I have no hope if the ip still owned by DS and dude wants them to allow him to produce more SR..
To be fair, there isn't really much profit in releasing stuff for free. Would be cool if they did, but I just don't see it happening unless they get a financial incentive. They legit release Re-Elected on Steam just so they could double the retail price SRIV, I wouldn't be surprised if raising the price of SR2 is a big reason why we haven't heard about patch getting canned yet.
I will say, half of these they don't actually have say in creating, and they only handled distributing the games in Europe. A lot of their profits came from releasing Japanese titles like Yakuza series in Europe which is what gave them enough money to actually afford Saints Row IP.
No that's why I'm saying I'm surprised they didn't just release the tools for a fee. Similar to how Bethesda would release a map editor (except in Deepsilvers case charging for it)
Then just don't pre-order it. It's absurd to jump to the conclusion that $100 is unreasonable when you don't know what the game itself includes.
Like i said we are agree and disagree in here.. if you want gta6 price going to be $100 go ahead... But what it cost you want another game industry cost like that and starting the trend not all people want any game price above $60-70 they have right state their opinion not because they arent rich..other devs will do the same thing+And its not even included with DLC so feels like they robbing you... Even with Pre order price its depends on you for take the price or not.. want to face the bug and glitch you can found and its up to you for playing day one.
That's fine with me but it's interesting your opinion stems from the blind assumption GTA6 is going to be noticeably divided with DLC when we don't even know what features actually exist other than what can be guessed from nitpicking at trailers and screenshots. If there was a recent announcement that GTA6 with half its storymode is $100 dollars and I have to sell my left nut for the other half, or god forbid the "true ending", I'll retract my opinion happily.
First off this isn't 2010, inflation and production costs for video games is both inflated and increased due to the technology at hand. I don't have to be privileged and rich (I certainly am not) to face the reality a dozen of eggs used to cost around a $1.66 and now the average is around $3.59.
It isn't great inflation exists, in a perfect world I don't want to pay $100 for anything that used to be lower. But it certainly isn't considerate to reality when you expect games to pander to whatever price has sat in your budget for a decade when both the economical climate and the entire industry has severely evolved.
Maybe they might, and with the way the world is going it might be an inescapable reality, this isn't coming down to just greed, even though it's easier to believe it is.